WebModels Forum is a message board for models, photographers, agents, managers, and others associated with the modeling industry.



WebModels Forum Message Archives

Re: "implied" vs "covered" nudes


[ Post New Message ] [ WebModels Forum ] [ FAQ ] [ Forum Policies ]

Posted by: Rattlesnake Stu (216.162.193.182) on December 01, 2002 at 20:47:53

Location: Seatle/Tacoma area

In Reply to: posted by Doug Lester on November 30, 2002 at 17:31:33:

At least from an English language perspective, that makes a whole lot more sense! The word implied does not mean covered and a lot of the posts that refer to 'implied' really mean 'covered' when there is little to no doubt that the model really was nude (and thus there is no meaningful implication).

ObBadJoke: There's an 'l' of a difference between pubic and public. :-)



Follow Ups:



Do Not Reply to Archived Messages

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Password:  A password is required to post messages. If you do not have one, pleaseregister now!
Subject : 
Location:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Example: http://www.webmodels.com

Link Title:
Example: WebModels - Information and Resources

Optional Image URL:
Example: http://www.webmodels.com/images/webmodels.jpg

Do Not Reply to Archived Messages


[ Post New Message ] [ WebModels Forum ] [ FAQ ] [ Forum Policies ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved
Password Feature © 1998,2001 Eric Ahrens