WebModels Forum is a message board for models, photographers, agents, managers, and others associated with the modeling industry.



WebModels Forum Message Archives

"implied" vs "covered" nudes


[ Post New Message ] [ WebModels Forum ] [ FAQ ] [ Forum Policies ]

Posted by: Doug Lester (216.175.66.81) on November 30, 2002 at 17:31:33

Location: Atlanta

In Reply to: I like posted by Cami on November 30, 2002 at 15:41:10:

Actually there are a couple of terms which are used pretty much interchangeably on the net, but actually have sightly different meanings. A "covered" or "hidden" nude is one in which the model is obviously nude, but the parts are covered by something like an arm, a piece of fabric or most anything else which blocks or hides the 'parts' from view. Cami's pic, shown in her post is an example of a covered or hidden Nude.

In a "implied" nude, it isn't clearly obvouls that the model is nude. It looks like she is, but she may not be; the pose implies nudity while she may actually be wearing shorts or a swimsuit. A lot of those were shot vefore nudity became as accepted as it is today. The attached is pretty much "implied" nudity.



Follow Ups:



Do Not Reply to Archived Messages

Name    : 
E-Mail  : 
Password:  A password is required to post messages. If you do not have one, pleaseregister now!
Subject : 
Location:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Example: http://www.webmodels.com

Link Title:
Example: WebModels - Information and Resources

Optional Image URL:
Example: http://www.webmodels.com/images/webmodels.jpg

Do Not Reply to Archived Messages


[ Post New Message ] [ WebModels Forum ] [ FAQ ] [ Forum Policies ]

WWWAdmin 2.0a © 1997 Matt Wright and DBasics Software Company, All Rights Reserved
Password Feature © 1998,2001 Eric Ahrens